Windows Media Center RSS 2.0
 Friday, October 14, 2005

First of all, I love his conclusion (I couldn't have said it better myself)...

'...existing XP Media Center Edition 2005 users have a wonderful and free update that gives them new capabilities and better stability and performance. And potential Media Center PC buyers no longer have any reason to hold out. Either way, UR2 will give you the best possible PC-based DVR and digital media experience available today. Highly recommended.'

There are a few inaccuracies in Pauls review though...

Paul --> '...you can still only record two shows at a time, even with four tuner cards installed.'

False. You can do 4 recordings all at the same time. 2 x NTSC and 2 x ATSC while playing back a recorded show (NTSC or ATSC) on the Media Center PC and / or Media Center Extender(s).

Paul --> Microsoft has added a fourth zoom mode, intelligent zoom. In this mode, the edges aren't actually pushed off the side of the screen; instead, the center of the picture is stretched more than the edges”

Actually, it's exactly the opposite. Its stretched LESS in the middle and MORE at the edges.

Paul --> Media Center does a "soft reboot," shutting down and restarting all 6 of its background services (such as those that control TV recording and scheduling).”

False. We only restart ehShell.exe -- all other Media Center services are left untouched.  In addition, the conditions in which the restart of ehShell.exe will occur are very, very specific.  In a nutshell, the restart happens only if we can guarantee there will be NO user experience impact at all. A simple example is there is no restart if you are listening or watching any content, or recording a show. I can see this feature might become thorny for some -- Ed Bott has already asked 'So what happens if I’m recording a movie from a pay channel that runs from 3:00 AM to 5:00 AM?'  The answer is your recording is not affected. In fact, end users should never even know this feature is there at all.

Categories: Media Center | Comments [6] | # | Posted on Friday, October 14, 2005 5:07:00 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)   
Friday, October 14, 2005 5:30:04 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Is this accurate from Paul's review?

"Today's Media Center Extender devices are standard definition (SD) only, and don't natively support HDTV. (That said, you can indeed display HD content through an Extender, though it will be down-sampled to SD)."

That would mean that current extenders will now display HD content in SD with rollup 2. I'm not seeing it - I get the windows that says the extender doesn't support digital tv content.
TonyS
Friday, October 14, 2005 6:57:27 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
"Paul --> '...you can still only record two shows at a time, even with four tuner cards installed."

Paul should have listened to my show with Matt he explained well the TV card functions
Saturday, October 15, 2005 2:37:27 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
How about playing Windows Media Audio Pro 5.1 multichannel 96/24 audio, with DRM, through the XBox 360? I understand it decodes DolbyDigital 5.1, etc., but what will the implementation of WMA be at launch, thereafter?
Saturday, October 15, 2005 5:56:20 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
unfortunately, it seems that your last sentence sums up my entire review of this overhyped rollup: "...end users should never even know this feature is there at all."

After installing on 2 MCEs here, we came to the conclusion that a new zoom mode, an optimization feature that does *something* at 4:00am, and some features that aren't available to us are all that were added. If there was some documentation (a readme would be fine) that listed the actual features and why they are or aren't available (or visible) would be so nice.

Instead, we have a zoom mode, some features that we, as users, should never know about (DVD burning improvements, bug fixes, etc), and some features that MCE buyers will enjoy on their new machines next year that may or may not be somewhere hidden on our machines.

I am sure that you'll be able to add XBox 360 integration to our list in a couple months, but that's not really something I care about at all, the xbox stays in my roomy's bedroom, I never even see it. The living room games are PC games sent to the 120" projector. :)
Tuesday, October 18, 2005 7:11:10 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
The "optimization" is simply a restart of ehshell.exe?

I don't have Media Center personally, but I know it's largely written in managed code. Makes me wonder if this restart is necessitated by poor garbage collection or some other consequence of being written in .NET.
PatriotB
Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:13:55 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
You know, with every release I keep hoping a few things that are IMO sub-optimal with the music interface will be fixed, but they're not. My biggest problems:

1. When sorting by Genre, the next sort level is album. Why? Every other music cataloguer sorts by Genre->ARTIST->Album. Does anyone really want to see a list of album titles rather than artists when drilling down into a genre?

2. When sorting by Artist, if some tracks for that artist aren't assigned, they show up under "Unknown" for album. But when going to "Unknown," you get EVERY artist's tracks where the album is unknown rather than those of the single artist you originally went to.

3. The initial sort in the music section is by Album. I know that's because it's alphabetically before Artist, but again, no one with a decent-sized music collection wants a huge list of albums initially. The default really should be Artist or Genre (or at least there should be a way to change it, or MCE should remember your last sort level).

4. I know that "Album Artist" is used by MCE because of compilations. This is to me a classic example of hard cases making bad law - 95% of music browsing would be better served by always using the simple "Artist" tag, since (a) the field MCE calls "Album Artist" other software calls something else and (b) most tagging software doesn't fill in either of those fields automatically when ripping.

I've sent in feature requests before, and seen others discuss these issues, but I've never seen reasons as to why Microsoft made the choices they did rather than sticking with the interface established by nearly all other music catalogs, and the iPod interface in particular. In fact, I haven't noticed any real music UI improvements since the first version of MCE. I just don't get it - these are pretty simple things, why not consider changes that would make it better?

Sorry for the rant - just found the blog and figured I'd vent. For those of us with many thousands of mp3s, seemingly little issues like this can make it a real pain to find the music we want to listen to. I really like my MCE, but wish the music interface UI made things easier.
Scott
Comments are closed.
ZuneCard
GamerTag
About

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

© Copyright 2008 Charlie Owen

Sign In
Statistics
Total Posts: 273
This Year: 15
This Month: 7
This Week: 5
Comments: 1355
All Content © 2008, Charlie Owen