Windows Media Center RSS 2.0
 Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Chris and I have been having an offline, private email chat today -- all of it good discussion -- I'll leave it up to him to share what he wishes from that exchange of thoughts. Truly, thanks for engaging, Chris, both publicly and privately -- and pushing us on these issues. Chris has also been posting comments both here and here. He still can't bring himself to accept the challenge (yet). Rather, he wants to claim the following...

"We're comparing apples and oranges, discussing different qualities of each, and you're wanting me to put an orange up against your apple."

Nice subtle inflection point, by the way, comparing your Linux orange with my Windows apple. (I caught the 'wink', so perhaps not too subtle.) If I buy into this statement I would be de facto conceding Mac OS X is better than Windows Vista (or even Windows XP) -- which it isn't (in my opinion). But I digress.

Right before that statement Chris compares and contrasts the features quite boldly:

"When I rave about XGL, it's because of what it's doing - and how it does what it does. Nothing even comes close to that in Windows Vista - in pure features or implementation. If there's a challenge (in my mind), it's already been settled. Vista's new Win+Tab feature vs. the XGL shortcuts in a Linux DE."

In my way of thinking, you can't have it both ways. Either we can compare these things, or we can't. If we can't, then don't.

So, while he is deciding on whether to accept the challenge: I installed SUSE 10.1 tonight. I have *only* installed (accepting all defaults except for prompts such as user name and password stuff) and booted to the desktop -- then turned off the machine. I learned some things (you can't help but learn if you choose to install) which I will share at a later date.

Chris, you better accept (or decline) fast -- while I'm still relatively ignorant.

P.S. Hurry -- I'm downloading the Mandriva ISO now...!

Categories: Linux | Windows Vista | Comments [2] | # | Posted on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:19:21 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)   
Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:56:31 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I have an ATI Radeon X300/X500 video card (not top of the line, but still quite good) and XGL/Compiz is still not supported on it. Oh I see, what, no driver support for my card? Ah.

On the other hand, Vista handles it just fine, with full Aero theme enabled by default.

I don't recall where I read it, but there was a discussion somewhere about the implementation of the display sub-system in Vista vs. the XGL/Compiz implementation where they basically called the XGL/Compiz implementation a big hack.
Friday, September 15, 2006 3:59:16 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I think the challenge is childish. It doesn't prove anything.

Chris' criticism should be harsh. Why not? If he is reviewing an unreleased copy, which is still being updated while we speak, the criticism is only more worthwhile.

Of course, he might be wrong. That's what I keep hearing in the Beta updates when reported bugs are often corrected back a few generations, but you don't see it. This is especially true of the harshly criticized Beta 2.

If Chris is wrong, it's Microsoft's fault for shipping a crappy RC1.

However, you might be correct that Chris is wrong based on what you've experienced with RC1 and with XGL. In the end, it really doesn't matter.

Surprise us when the product is released!!!

Timmy
Comments are closed.
ZuneCard
GamerTag
About

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

© Copyright 2008 Charlie Owen

Sign In
All Content © 2008, Charlie Owen